NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2004
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV43
GPU Name
Vega 10
NV43 GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
Curie
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
110 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
