NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 19 years late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2004
Release Date
Aug 2023
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
100
-
Shading Units
12800
8
TMUs
400
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
NV43
GPU Name
AD102
NV43 GL
GPU Variant
AD102
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
