Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2004
Release Date
Dec 2022
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
142
-
Shading Units
18176
8
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

NV43
GPU Name
AD102
NV43 GL
GPU Variant
AD102
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy