Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 570 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 570
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M +1872%
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
3.680 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
29.44 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

38W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy