NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 4GB VRAM GRID K540Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K540Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
GRID K540Q
+1873%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GK104
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
