Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1550MHz vs 1442MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 732.2GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100
10.34 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +114%
22.22 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1304 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
715 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
7168
224
TMUs
448
96
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
100 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.0
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net