NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100
+351%
10.34 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1304 MHz
Base Clock
-
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1536
224
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP100
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.0
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
