Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1442MHz
Lower TDP (235W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 732.2GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100
10.34 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +42%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1304 MHz
Base Clock
-
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
8192
224
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.0
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy