Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K100M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

NVIDIA Quadro K100M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K100M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
16192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K100M
0.326 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +15982%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
100 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy