Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro K100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K100M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K100M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +2811%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU104B
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy