NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
+206%
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2496
32
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK110
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
