Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +7052%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
16384
32
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
600W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
100 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy