Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M60

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M60

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 8GB VRAM Tesla M60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla M60 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla M60 +558%
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM204
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy