NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 24GB VRAM Tesla P40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P40 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (347.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Tesla P40
+1955%
11.76 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
30
Tesla P40
+2556%
797
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Tesla P40
+1283%
166
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1303 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1808 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
347.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
183.7 GFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.76 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
367.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP102
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
