Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +341%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2200 +476%
121
Quadro K1000M
21
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy