Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1124MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (68W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +261%
5.196 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200
33
Quadro K6000 +148%
82
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
2880
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy