Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +11209%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
228
768
Shading Units
14592
64
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
MI300
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy