NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+1181%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
768
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA100
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
