Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000M +1342%
1.154 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
32
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
48.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1154 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
48.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
N14E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy