Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +54%
1.786 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4000M
94
Quadro M2000 +54%
145
OctaneBench
Quadro K4000M
20
Quadro M2000 +40%
28
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
48.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1154 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
48.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM206
N14E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy