Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +5920%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1344
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

108W
TDP
34W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G96
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy