NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+409%
11.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
350W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
