Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (122W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 10 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +5%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy