NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+346%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1536
Shading Units
256
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
142W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
