NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+239%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
7
1536
Shading Units
336
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
