Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q +131%
5.032 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net