Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +280%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

122W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy