NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
18112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M
1.615 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X
+10017%
163.4 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
19456
112
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
MI300
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
