Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M +1395%
1.615 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1344
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT216
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy