NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M
+7240%
1.615 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370M
0.022 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
1344
Shading Units
8
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G98
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
NB9M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
