NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 108% (1600MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+2113%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
16384
128
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
