NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1178MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
GRID M60 2Q
+103%
4.825 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
557 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM204
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
