NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1395MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+322%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
1536
Shading Units
3584
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU102
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
