Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 204W)
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M +130%
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
448
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
204W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy