NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 110% (1620MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+40%
3.318 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5100M
1273
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+152%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5100M
507
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+196%
1505
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU117
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
