Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1178MHz vs 771MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
GRID M60 2Q +35%
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
557 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2048
192
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy