CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 SDI and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 239W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 SDI
5.196 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+223%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 SDI
VS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
4096
240
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Board Design
239W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 3x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
2
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
3
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
5
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
6
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
7
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
8
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs NVIDIA GRID K2
9
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
10
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy