Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q +782%
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
15.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
376.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
15.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
TU117
N15M-Q2-B-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy