Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1710MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
A10G +3552%
31.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1320 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
384
Shading Units
9216
24
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA102
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy