Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 62W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620 +79%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
62W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF106
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy