Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620 +86%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy