Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1215MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +1558%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
384
Shading Units
5888
24
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA104
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy