NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M1000M
1.017 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+259%
3.656 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M1000M
985
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+226%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M1000M
363
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+292%
1426
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
1017 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU117
N16P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
