NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1395MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+459%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
TU102
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
