Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1380MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +646%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1024
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy