Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M +409%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GF106
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy