NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+342%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1024
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GF100
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
