NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000
+312%
8.873 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
Quadro P5000
+214%
6335
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
Quadro P5000
+208%
2900
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
180W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GP104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
