NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
+228%
7.066 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
+248%
7018
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
+251%
3309
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
220.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.13 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.066 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
