NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+952%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
6656
64
TMUs
416
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
